Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:17

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Can I see some saggy tit pics and huge areolas pics?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How to reduce the age of the heart by 20 years - Times of India
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
'I feel for Jackson': Tigers' Jobe out for season with elbow surgery - The Detroit News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Drug deaths plummet among young Americans as fentanyl carnage eases - NPR
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is gravity just entropy rising? Long-shot idea gets another look - Hacker News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Stock futures rise after S&P 500 notches a fresh record high: Live updates - CNBC
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Florence gallery says portrait damaged by visitor taking a selfie - BBC